The NFL 2019 fantasy football strength of schedule (SOS) position rankings are based on fantasy points allowed by position during the 2018 regular season.
The higher the rank number, the easiest/best/most optimal schedule that team’s position will face and conversely, the lower the rank number, the hardest/worst/least optimal schedule that team’s position will face.
For example, Baltimore RBs have the easiest schedule and Kansas City WRs face the toughest schedule.
This will be a good starting point prior to team roster changes due to offseason transactions and the draft.
Each position below can be sorted in either ascending or descending order.
NFL 2019 Strength of Schedule
| TEAM | QB | RB | WR | TE | K | DEF | DL | LB | DB | PR | KR | 2019 Opponent Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carolina Panthers | 1 | 19 | 2 | 28 | 24 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 30 | 31 | 16 | AFC S, NFC W, @GB, WAS |
| Arizona Cardinals | 2 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 17 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 10 | AFC N, NFC S, DET, @NYG |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 23 | 27 | 28 | 24 | 23 | 20 | 13 | AFC W, NFC S, @CIN, NYJ |
| Baltimore Ravens | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 23 | 23 | 21 | 3 | 18 | AFC E, NFC W, @KC, HOU |
| Buffalo Bills | 5 | 16 | 3 | 14 | 1 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 13 | 4 | 23 | AFC N, NFC E, @TEN, DEN |
| Indianapolis Colts | 6 | 29 | 18 | 5 | 32 | 23 | 14 | 15 | 32 | 19 | 21 | AFC W, NFC S, @PIT, MIA |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 7 | 27 | 13 | 24 | 27 | 30 | 6 | 4 | 31 | 30 | 26 | AFC S, NFC W, NYG, @DET |
| Seattle Seahawks | 8 | 4 | 6 | 20 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 23 | 25 | AFC N, NFC S, @PHI, MIN |
| San Francisco 49ers | 9 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 15 | 14 | 8 | 21 | 26 | 14 | 11 | AFC N, NFC S, @WAS, GB |
| Los Angeles Rams | 10 | 6 | 8 | 23 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 17 | AFC N, NFC S, CHI, @DAL |
| New Orleans Saints | 11 | 21 | 16 | 12 | 29 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 24 | 29 | 31 | AFC S, NFC W, DAL, @CHI |
| Atlanta Falcons | 12 | 31 | 7 | 18 | 25 | 17 | 7 | 2 | 20 | 32 | 30 | AFC S, NFC W, @MIN, PHI |
| New England Patriots | 13 | 3 | 14 | 21 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 14 | 29 | 8 | 32 | AFC N, NFC E, @HOU, KC |
| Tennessee Titans | 14 | 17 | 29 | 1 | 30 | 24 | 29 | 12 | 27 | 24 | 28 | AFC W, NFC S, @CLE, BUF |
| Houston Texans | 15 | 30 | 30 | 4 | 31 | 32 | 22 | 11 | 22 | 27 | 7 | AFC W, NFC S, @BAL, NE |
| New York Jets | 16 | 8 | 28 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 30 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 20 | AFC N, NFC E, @JAX, OAK |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 17 | 2 | 26 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 20 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 9 | AFC E, NFC W, @LAC, IND |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 18 | 24 | 27 | 2 | 20 | 19 | 21 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 14 | AFC S, NFC N, @MIA, PIT |
| Dallas Cowboys | 19 | 28 | 1 | 32 | 5 | 21 | 26 | 17 | 14 | 28 | 27 | AFC E, NFC N, @NO, LAR |
| Minnesota Vikings | 20 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 19 | 26 | 19 | 27 | 8 | 15 | 3 | AFC W, NFC E, ATL, @SEA |
| Cleveland Browns | 21 | 12 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 10 | 18 | 16 | 12 | 2 | 12 | AFC E, NFC W, TEN, @DEN |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 22 | 25 | 24 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 25 | 1 | 15 | AFC E, NFC W, JAX, @OAK |
| New York Giants | 23 | 22 | 9 | 31 | 11 | 1 | 13 | 19 | 10 | 11 | 29 | AFC E, NFC N, @TB, ARI |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 24 | 9 | 22 | 29 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 22 | AFC E, NFC N, @ATL, SEA |
| Chicago Bears | 25 | 20 | 21 | 26 | 16 | 29 | 17 | 29 | 9 | 21 | 4 | AFC W, NFC E, MIN, @LAR |
| Miami Dolphins | 26 | 10 | 20 | 27 | 4 | 22 | 32 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 8 | AFC N, NFC E, LAC, @IND |
| Washington Redskins | 27 | 23 | 15 | 30 | 6 | 18 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 25 | 24 | AFC E, NFC N, SF, @CAR |
| Oakland Raiders | 28 | 11 | 25 | 9 | 22 | 31 | 27 | 31 | 17 | 12 | 5 | AFC S, NFC N, CIN, @NYJ |
| Green Bay Packers | 29 | 26 | 23 | 15 | 21 | 20 | 11 | 28 | 1 | 18 | 19 | AFC W, NFC E, CAR, @SF |
| Denver Broncos | 30 | 18 | 31 | 6 | 26 | 15 | 25 | 22 | 28 | 16 | 2 | AFC S, NFC N, CLE, @BUF |
| Detroit Lions | 31 | 13 | 19 | 22 | 8 | 13 | 12 | 32 | 2 | 26 | 6 | AFC W, NFC E, @ARI, TB |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 32 | 32 | 32 | 8 | 28 | 28 | 15 | 26 | 3 | 9 | 1 | AFC S, NFC N, BAL, @NE |
Submit your review | |
Average rating: 0 reviews